<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LSI &#8211; No more!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/lsi-no-more/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/lsi-no-more/</link>
	<description>a bridge between worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: More LSI amusement &#124; Science for SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/lsi-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-412</link>
		<dc:creator>More LSI amusement &#124; Science for SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2009 12:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/wordpress/?p=150#comment-412</guid>
		<description>[...] wrote about the SEO-LSI phenomenon and also about how Google clearly do value methods such as [...]&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] wrote about the SEO-LSI phenomenon and also about how Google clearly do value methods such as [...]<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/lsi-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/wordpress/?p=150#comment-52</guid>
		<description>Dave, that is a brilliant geeky joke - binary pie for you!&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, that is a brilliant geeky joke &#8211; binary pie for you!<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: theGypsy</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/lsi-no-more/comment-page-1/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>theGypsy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/wordpress/?p=150#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Nice round up… To be honest Applied Semantics version of LSA was tailored to Ads and I suspect that’s where it ended up when Google purchased them – AdSense/AdWords. To me other semantic approaches (such as Anna’s probabilistic/phrase based stuff seems more likely in the reg index) – but that’s just me.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;My fav flavor? Probably PLSI (get it… ‘probably’ :0)&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Dave&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice round up… To be honest Applied Semantics version of LSA was tailored to Ads and I suspect that’s where it ended up when Google purchased them – AdSense/AdWords. To me other semantic approaches (such as Anna’s probabilistic/phrase based stuff seems more likely in the reg index) – but that’s just me.</p>
<p>My fav flavor? Probably PLSI (get it… ‘probably’ :0)</p>
<p>Dave<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.732 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-19 05:23:00 -->
