<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Information credibility analysis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/information-credibility-analysis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/information-credibility-analysis/</link>
	<description>a bridge between worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben McKay</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/uncategorized/information-credibility-analysis/comment-page-1/#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben McKay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/wordpress/?p=192#comment-96</guid>
		<description>I read something about the topic from a colleague&#039;s site; the post is here:&lt;br/&gt;http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/blog/web30-concept-notes.php&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;The big problem as I see it, is trying to identify people in a trustworthy way...like with social media - it&#039;s so easily spammed with multiple pseudonyms, etc...&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;It&#039;s good to see that there is research going in to this field, but I do doubt it&#039;s reliablity for now.  People would have to entrust a lot more information to such a technology in order for them to be accurately identified, and of course avoid the situation of multiple pseudonyms. &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;...This is only a potentially negative repercussion, but for those that follow the rules, it would be massively valuable I expect.&lt;br/&gt; &lt;br/&gt;Really interesting post CJ - thanks for that.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Ben&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read something about the topic from a colleague&#8217;s site; the post is here:<br /><a href="http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/blog/web30-concept-notes.php">http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/blog/web30-concept-notes.php</a><img src="http://www.scienceforseo.com/wp-content/plugins/zitgist-browser-linker/imgs/mini_rdf.gif" border="0" style="cursor: pointer; padding:0px 0px 0px 2px; margin:0px;" onmouseover="assignPopup(this, 'http://www.webdesignfromscratch.com/blog/web30-concept-notes.php', 'http://www.scienceforseo.com/wp-content/plugins/zitgist-browser-linker/');" /></p>
<p>The big problem as I see it, is trying to identify people in a trustworthy way&#8230;like with social media &#8211; it&#8217;s so easily spammed with multiple pseudonyms, etc&#8230;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s good to see that there is research going in to this field, but I do doubt it&#8217;s reliablity for now.  People would have to entrust a lot more information to such a technology in order for them to be accurately identified, and of course avoid the situation of multiple pseudonyms. </p>
<p>&#8230;This is only a potentially negative repercussion, but for those that follow the rules, it would be massively valuable I expect.</p>
<p>Really interesting post CJ &#8211; thanks for that.</p>
<p>Ben<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.114 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-24 09:18:28 -->
