Comments on: A case for online algorithms

By: CJ

CJ — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:53:47 +0000

Thank you, I’m glad it’s useful to you.

By: Rochester NY

Rochester NY — Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:17:36 +0000

Great site, I have been looking into google algorithms and i am glad I found this. Keep up the great work! All the best

By: ben

ben — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:47:54 +0000

fantastic blog this is what ive been looking for cheers SEO

By: Nico

Nico — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 15:59:10 +0000

Brilliant. You totally had me fooled. The abstract was baffling, but then I expected to be baffled.

By: mosquito

mosquito — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 13:12:01 +0000

ohh no, i don’t believe it damn april 1!

By: CJ

CJ — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 12:39:27 +0000

By: mosquito

mosquito — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:55:12 +0000

hi, it seems the link doesn’t work. could you provide me a working one?

By: aaa

aaa — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 09:13:40 +0000

Could i have a copi of the report?
Thank you

By: CJ

CJ — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:52:17 +0000

Thank you, we did strive to write for the layman, in fact we tested it on a group of grandma’s.

By: phaithful

phaithful — Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:48:59 +0000

I found the comparison of the simple and complex Bayesian filters combined with the Spearmand and Jaccard indexes to be the best allegory to the difference between Yahoo and Google’s algorithm.

Very telling and insightful looks at what’s really going under the hood of those sneaky search engines.

I really wish you guys did a deeper dive on the handling of the Anaphora Resolution and the tokenization of the Named Entity Recognition with comparison to the Live / Powerset algo.

I must say, a very excellent read! Also it was written so simply that even my grandma who barely knows how to check her “Hotmail” understood all the concepts.