http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/over-optimised-sites-nullified/ a bridge between worlds Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:02:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/over-optimised-sites-nullified/comment-page-1/#comment-440 Topics about Seo » Science for SEO Tue, 21 Apr 2009 19:24:29 +0000 http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=763#comment-440 [...] Over-optimised sites nullified | Science for SEO [...]<!-- Touched by JuLiA --> [...] Over-optimised sites nullified | Science for SEO [...]

]]> http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/over-optimised-sites-nullified/comment-page-1/#comment-434 CJ Tue, 21 Apr 2009 07:29:53 +0000 http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=763#comment-434 Definitely, trust is a very important factor indeed but it's not that easy to measure. There's issues with gathering user data for obvious reasons, but the logs are telling. Capturing browsing data is very valuable, and then I think using the visibility of the site through the social media landscape is very important as well - lots of work to be done in ranking still!<!-- Touched by JuLiA --> Definitely, trust is a very important factor indeed but it’s not that easy to measure. There’s issues with gathering user data for obvious reasons, but the logs are telling. Capturing browsing data is very valuable, and then I think using the visibility of the site through the social media landscape is very important as well – lots of work to be done in ranking still!

]]> http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/over-optimised-sites-nullified/comment-page-1/#comment-432 Mr. Gunn Tue, 21 Apr 2009 06:21:33 +0000 http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=763#comment-432 That's really interesting, CJ. Isn't that where trust-based networks really show their worth? If a SEO'd site can drown an non-SEO site in search, but the non-SEO site is the one every real person talks about, then that provides a compensating advantage for the "real" site, right?<!-- Touched by JuLiA --> That’s really interesting, CJ. Isn’t that where trust-based networks really show their worth? If a SEO’d site can drown an non-SEO site in search, but the non-SEO site is the one every real person talks about, then that provides a compensating advantage for the “real” site, right?

]]>