Comments on: Google semantic web

By: CJ

CJ — Fri, 22 May 2009 01:10:54 +0000

Hi, Sorry Black dress, I’m not sure I follow!

By: 3 Laws of SEO | SEO'Brien | interactive marketing

3 Laws of SEO | SEO'Brien | interactive marketing — Tue, 19 May 2009 07:19:35 +0000

[...] considerations associated with search engine optimization (not withstanding the new developments in semantic search), I’ve been asking myself if it isn’t possible to summarize 3 immutable laws of SEO. [...]

By: CJ

CJ — Mon, 18 May 2009 02:14:51 +0000

Yes I agree with you. Yahoo has done a huge amount of work in semantic web though, more than Google has delivered so far.

By: Hugo at Zeta

Hugo at Zeta — Mon, 18 May 2009 02:12:08 +0000

I think that computer learning in general has a little ways to go before we can truly usher in the age of the semantic web (and semantic computing in general) but I do agree that the analysis of structured data snippets will be one of the stepping stones.

By: CJ

CJ — Sat, 16 May 2009 00:50:52 +0000

I think that new born semantic web is structured data but the future is not necessarily structured using OWL or RDFa or whatever. These are a very necessary step though. There’s always structure of some kind, but it won’t need to be as rigid.

By: mosquito

mosquito — Fri, 15 May 2009 10:40:15 +0000

Cj, a lot of people think structured data = semantic web. Can you agree or disagree with that? I don’t agree with it, but i would like to hear your opinion