<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How we categorise nouns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/</link>
	<description>a bridge between worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 14:02:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Wendel Moreira</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1298</link>
		<dc:creator>Wendel Moreira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 09:38:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1298</guid>
		<description>I agree with SEO Nepal and I think with the Instant Search this &#039;joke&#039; will be pretty cool.
Great article.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with SEO Nepal and I think with the Instant Search this &#8216;joke&#8217; will be pretty cool.<br />
Great article.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1226</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 12:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1226</guid>
		<description>Thank you Frank :)&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Frank <img src='http://www.scienceforseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1225</guid>
		<description>Amazing findings!
Congratulations to those guys.
Congratulations for you too, CJ.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amazing findings!<br />
Congratulations to those guys.<br />
Congratulations for you too, CJ.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1222</guid>
		<description>Hi guys,

yes it&#039;s pretty interesting. If we understand how people process words then we can be more efficient communicators! Barry, yes you could classify keywords like this. It&#039;s early days, but it&#039;s pretty interesting to play with as an idea.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys,</p>
<p>yes it&#8217;s pretty interesting. If we understand how people process words then we can be more efficient communicators! Barry, yes you could classify keywords like this. It&#8217;s early days, but it&#8217;s pretty interesting to play with as an idea.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 14:43:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>Very intriguing indeed. In time we should be able to classify types of keywords along these three categories, and make sure our SEO strategy aligns with keyword usage and customer expectations. For example do you focus on one type of keyword (&#039;shelter&#039; words for a property site) or do you spread your targeted keywords around the categories to ensure you catch users in whatever mindset they are? Fascinating.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very intriguing indeed. In time we should be able to classify types of keywords along these three categories, and make sure our SEO strategy aligns with keyword usage and customer expectations. For example do you focus on one type of keyword (&#8216;shelter&#8217; words for a property site) or do you spread your targeted keywords around the categories to ensure you catch users in whatever mindset they are? Fascinating.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SEO Nepal</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/information-retrieval/how-we-categorise-nouns/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>SEO Nepal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 12:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1491#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>an interesting theory. should help in keyword suggestion.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an interesting theory. should help in keyword suggestion.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 1.170 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2013-05-25 10:02:42 -->
