Comments on: SEO Copywriting is Dead! Here’s Proof…

By: Ashbey

Ashbey — Thu, 17 Dec 2009 10:28:16 +0000

“SEO Copywriting” cannot be dead because it was never there.

I think there is nothing like “SEO Copywriting” if an article is well written, it will automatically cover the main subject and topics related to it. It is all about good copy writing.

Adding “SEO” to copy writing just gives a psychological advantage that the piece of literature is now search engine friendly.

By: How to write for the web and improve your SEO | seo-web-copywriter.com

How to write for the web and improve your SEO | seo-web-copywriter.com — Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:44:36 +0000

[...] Glenn Murray wrote an interesting guest post on scienceforseo.com titled SEO Copywriting is Dead! Here’s Proof… [...]

By: Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice | Did You Know?

Your Content Should Educate, Engage, Entertain and Entice | Did You Know? — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 21:15:34 +0000

[...] at Science for SEO, Glenn Murray authored an insightful post that argues that copywriters don’t have to worry about keywords anymore. The search engines (unlike most of us) have gotten a lot more perceptive over the past few [...]

By: Suchmaschinen & SEO – Juni 2009 - Inhouse SEO

Suchmaschinen & SEO – Juni 2009 - Inhouse SEO — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 19:07:21 +0000

[...] Eine weitere Betrachtung zum Thema findet sich auch bei h1h2h3 sowie bei Science for SEO. [...]

By: Money Links (weekly) : Money Conciousness

Money Links (weekly) : Money Conciousness — Mon, 22 Jun 2009 09:35:46 +0000

[...] SEO Copywriting is Dead! Here’s Proof… | Science for SEO [...]

By: CJ

CJ — Thu, 18 Jun 2009 07:20:56 +0000

Glad you like the site” Glenn wrote this though

By: Glenn Murray

Glenn Murray — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 23:49:22 +0000

Hi June. Thanks for your comment. I agree that there are a lot of high ranking sites with poor, but highly optimized, copy. But that doesn’t mean they rank well BECAUSE of the poor copy. Similarly, low ranking sites with great un-optimized copy don’t necessarily rank badly BECAUSE of the copy. There are a lot of other factors at play.

Also, I did say that dedicated SEO of copy is not necessary *if your copy is helpful, informative and on-topic*.

Cheers.

By: Asif

Asif — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 22:53:36 +0000

I think there is a distinction to be made between copy used in an article and copy used on product or introduction page. The semantic and keyword cloud come into their element on article based pages, however, many sites in the e-commerce world need to be less wordy , so SEO copy has to be a more considered activity in such cases.

By: Sprachurlaub Spanien

Sprachurlaub Spanien — Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:33:43 +0000

Marie-Claire,
thanks for providing this insightful article. It helps me a lot in understanding what my SEO guy is talking about. Now have to go on and read as much as I can of the other posts on you blog.
Thanks again and have a good time.

By: Wordle, an SEO Keyword Tool « Writing for the Internet

Wordle, an SEO Keyword Tool « Writing for the Internet — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:08:21 +0000

[...] writing, internet writing, SEO, wordle While reading an amazing article today titled, “SEO Copywriting is Dead!” by a copywriter, for copywriters, I came across a tool known as [...]