<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Science for SEO</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.scienceforseo.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com</link>
	<description>a bridge between worlds</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:52:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semantic web spam: SemSpam by Barry Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/semantic-web-spam-semspam/comment-page-1/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1550#comment-1238</guid>
		<description>The spam problem is indeed a powerful issue for the semantic web, but there&#039;s another issue that I think is just as important: content scrapers. The semantic web makes it easier for all machines to understand data better, including malicious content scrapers. It&#039;ll make the content theft industry all that much more attractive.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The spam problem is indeed a powerful issue for the semantic web, but there&#8217;s another issue that I think is just as important: content scrapers. The semantic web makes it easier for all machines to understand data better, including malicious content scrapers. It&#8217;ll make the content theft industry all that much more attractive.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Semantic web spam: SemSpam by Glenn Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/semantic-web-spam-semspam/comment-page-1/#comment-1237</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1550#comment-1237</guid>
		<description>Interesting post, CJ. Microformats, etc., will no doubt be used and mis-used, and Google &amp; co will no doubt find ways to more-or-less filter the spam.

I think the really interesting thing you introduced here was the impact of individual trustworthiness based on social media accounts, etc. As this is much harder to manipulate effectively (i.e. it&#039;s harder to sneak social media spam past the guardians of social media: its users), I think this sort of signal has far greater potential, and that it will definitely happen (if it&#039;s not happening already).

I&#039;ve spoken to our Canuk friend, Dave &#039;the Gypsy&#039; Harry, and read his writings on the matter, and he&#039;s convinced it&#039;s quite a way off. Too hard to filter the noise. What are your thoughts?&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post, CJ. Microformats, etc., will no doubt be used and mis-used, and Google &amp; co will no doubt find ways to more-or-less filter the spam.</p>
<p>I think the really interesting thing you introduced here was the impact of individual trustworthiness based on social media accounts, etc. As this is much harder to manipulate effectively (i.e. it&#8217;s harder to sneak social media spam past the guardians of social media: its users), I think this sort of signal has far greater potential, and that it will definitely happen (if it&#8217;s not happening already).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve spoken to our Canuk friend, Dave &#8216;the Gypsy&#8217; Harry, and read his writings on the matter, and he&#8217;s convinced it&#8217;s quite a way off. Too hard to filter the noise. What are your thoughts?<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Semantic Web Chrome Extensions by CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/3-semantic-web-chrome-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 10:58:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1538#comment-1236</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kenneth, glad you appreciated it!&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kenneth, glad you appreciated it!<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 3 Semantic Web Chrome Extensions by Kenneth</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/3-semantic-web-chrome-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenneth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 13:02:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1538#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>Hey great post some good information shared here especially for those who are new to chrome or thinking about changing browser.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey great post some good information shared here especially for those who are new to chrome or thinking about changing browser.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keywords and epistemology by CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/keywords-and-epistemology/comment-page-1/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1508#comment-1234</guid>
		<description>Touché :)&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Touché <img src='http://www.scienceforseo.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> <!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 Semantic web FireFox extensions by Tom - marketing tips</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/semantic-web/7-semantic-web-firefox-extensions/comment-page-1/#comment-1233</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom - marketing tips</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1427#comment-1233</guid>
		<description>Good list of tools for Firefox.It is the best browser for IM use, IE does not have a chance.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good list of tools for Firefox.It is the best browser for IM use, IE does not have a chance.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Keywords and epistemology by Barry Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/seo-marketing/keywords-and-epistemology/comment-page-1/#comment-1232</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 10:19:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1508#comment-1232</guid>
		<description>This epistemic search seems related to that holy grail of search, semantic search - i.e. understanding the context of a search query.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This epistemic search seems related to that holy grail of search, semantic search &#8211; i.e. understanding the context of a search query.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Many followers != Influence by CJ</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/social-networks/many-followers-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-1231</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 01:13:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1487#comment-1231</guid>
		<description>I think that the quality of the followers is important. Better to have 10 followers who engage with your product/service/whatever than 20,000 who ignore you.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the quality of the followers is important. Better to have 10 followers who engage with your product/service/whatever than 20,000 who ignore you.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Many followers != Influence by Arte</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/social-networks/many-followers-influence/comment-page-1/#comment-1230</link>
		<dc:creator>Arte</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 17:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1487#comment-1230</guid>
		<description>Well... on the other hand big followers number can still be valuable. May be just to generate a sharp and sudden peak of traffic... still useful.&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; on the other hand big followers number can still be valuable. May be just to generate a sharp and sudden peak of traffic&#8230; still useful.<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Predictive Analytics at your fingertips &#8230; yes, time has come to forecast customer behavior in Excel! by sewa elf</title>
		<link>http://www.scienceforseo.com/technology-news/predictive-analytics-at-your-fingertips-yes-time-has-come-to-forecast-customer-behavior-in-excel/comment-page-1/#comment-1229</link>
		<dc:creator>sewa elf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 17:07:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scienceforseo.com/?p=1496#comment-1229</guid>
		<description>Thanks for information...realy helpfull&lt;!-- Touched by JuLiA --&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for information&#8230;realy helpfull<!-- Touched by JuLiA --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
