Archive for the ‘SEO & marketing’ Category

May 4th, 2009 - 1:52 pm § in SEO & marketing

Agile SEO

Dell Zhang wrote a nice post on his excellent blog called “Agile research methodology” where he took the 12 main Agile principles and adapted them to research. I thought this was really interesting and wondered if it could be done with SEO. I took a shot a it. It is to be debated, that&#[...]

April 24th, 2009 - 10:30 am § in SEO & marketing

Peer review for SEO

Peer review is a very important process in any profession. It ensures that certain standards are met, and that the quality of work being done in the profession is of a high standard. When that standard is not met, reviewers or peers are entitled to reject the work outright, or to ask for further res[...]

April 21st, 2009 - 1:13 pm § in SEO & marketing

Over-optimised sites nullified

A very useful and eye-opening paper crossed my desk called “Nullification test collections for web spam and SEO” by Jones and Ramesh, Hawking and Craswell from Canberra University in Australia. They want to encourage the compilation of a large corpus for adversial IR research. CMU are bu[...]

April 17th, 2009 - 7:09 pm § in SEO & marketing

More link analysis methods

Link building a fundamental part of SEO work but the analysis methods for these could be further expanded.  To me links as a entire entity are like a molecule in that everything is linked together and has an effect – “the simplest structural unit of an element or compound” (WordNe[...]

April 12th, 2009 - 10:20 pm § in SEO & marketing

More LSI amusement

I wanted to get your opinion on how the Google algorithm actually works according to Leslie Rohde from “StomperNet”.  He posted 2 videos, one about LSI and one about “Referential integrity”. “Warning – “Advanced” SEO Technique DOES NOT WORK” vi[...]

April 8th, 2009 - 12:46 pm § in SEO & marketing

Which SEO’s should not read IR or search papers

There has been a lot of chat in the past about whether SEO’s should read research papers around information retrieval and search.  I think it is important, but perhaps not for all of the SEO’s out there.  We don’t approach the business in the same way necessarily so for some it w[...]

March 13th, 2009 - 12:47 pm § in Information retrieval, SEO & marketing, Search engines, Tutorials

How to get through the papers

  I hear a lot of people (not particularly in research but in other less academic areas) saying that they don’t consider reading papers past 2008 important or useful because they’re are too dated.  I can understand why this perception is knocking around, but I think that ignoring older[...]

March 5th, 2009 - 1:11 pm § in SEO & marketing

Matt Cutts on that “Brand update”

Matt Cutts has spoken about what the change (not update, actually called “Vince”) on the Google search engine.  The main points to take away imho: “”Inside of Google, at least inside the search ranking team, we don’t really think about brands. We think about words like[...]

February 28th, 2009 - 1:43 pm § in SEO & marketing

Google Brand algo theory dissected

 There’s been much speculation, interesting theories, rubbish and misinterpretation about the “new Google branding algorithm”.  As always, when I see respected bloggers covering it, I like to educate myself as much as possible before I make a decision.  I take this very seriousl[...]

February 26th, 2009 - 10:59 pm § in Information retrieval, SEO & marketing

Long-tail is rubbish!

    I got to the Hitwise report through a link from Dave to a post on Search Engine Land written by Matt McGee (convoluted journey I know).  I liked the post because I have tons of papers and things to read each day and the concise writeup pleased me greatly.  The report (isn’t that long [...]





© 2009-2013 Science for SEO All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.