Archive for the ‘Semantic web’ Category

July 8th, 2009 - 12:27 am § in Semantic web

“Semantic web” != “semantics”

Alrighty, this post addresses the confusion I see about “semantics” and “the semantic web”. It’s not a complete misunderstanding, but rather an assumption that the semantic web = semantics. This isn’t quite right. I want to illustrate the difference by first provi[...]

July 6th, 2009 - 1:38 pm § in Semantic web

Fun SPARQLy RDF Search

“SPARQL” is pronounced “Sparkle” and stands for SPARQL “Protocol and RDF Query Language”. You didn’t really think there’d be something like RDF and not a query method for it did you? SPARQL is a query language and a protocol for accessing RDF. The RDF [...]

May 15th, 2009 - 1:12 pm § in Semantic web

Google semantic web

This is indeed an “I told you so” post. If you don’t recognise the logo above, then this is aimed at you Google have announced (12 May) that they are going to be using “Rich snippets”: “Rich Snippets give users convenient summary information about their search res[...]

April 20th, 2009 - 6:48 pm § in Semantic web

WP plugins to get semantic

There are a few plugins that are useful and easy to use on your WordPress blog. I use them and feel that none of us have any excuse to not get involved in the semantic web. Often the reason for not bothering has been time and complexity. Honestly, all you have to do is install [...][...]

April 15th, 2009 - 4:08 pm § in Information retrieval, Search engines, Semantic web

Off with your meta-tags

I wanted to talk about how computers deal with text, or rather how they deal with what text means.  Todd Mintz posted about Google returning something other than the meta-description he had supplied for example. In an ideal world, there would be no need for meta-tags as machines could understand th[...]

February 25th, 2009 - 2:35 pm § in Information retrieval, Ranking algorithms, Semantic web

New ranking algorithms

Ranking algorithms are changing a great deal at the moment.  Before, like HITS and PageRank they looked at how websites and pages were connected and used any information they could gather from those to use as variables.  Nowadays we’re seeing research papers come out focusing on how the sema[...]

February 4th, 2009 - 3:55 pm § in Semantic web

How to build a semantic web compliant website

I’ve been asked by a lot of people how to build a website that is semantic web compliant.  The general impression is that it is a lot of hard work and that it’s pretty useless right now.  Obviously I disagree – It’s not that hard, it involves learning a few new things, whic[...]

January 29th, 2009 - 2:02 pm § in Semantic web

"I won’t adopt the semantic web!"

I’ve heard variants of this for quite a long time, in fact since the semantic web thing became mainstream.  It’s never easy to introduce something new, as novel applications designers will know, and users don’t want to learn something new, however easy it is to pick up.  The sema[...]

December 17th, 2008 - 9:54 pm § in Semantic web

A global review of the semantic web industry

On the Cusp: “A global review of the semantic web industry” by David Provost is a great 38 pager on the semantic web industry at the moment.  It’s good because I don’t see many buzz words in there or very technical terms, it’s high level as it should be for managers, v[...]

December 1st, 2008 - 11:38 pm § in Semantic web

Google tech talk on the semantic web

This is by Professor Abraham Bernstein.  It’s very interesting, it’s all about what the semantic web is in brief, but mostly about the various techniques used such as SPARQL, Querix, Ginseng, OWL DL…these are however rubbish for humans mostly.  He explores how to make the semanti[...]





© 2009-2013 Science for SEO All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.