Archive for the ‘Search engines’ Category

January 14th, 2010 - 2:12 pm § in Search engines, Social networks

Who do we need in search?

The San Francisco Chronicle has an article out this week entitled “Social science meets computer science at Yahoo!”. It’s about how Yahoo have been hiring “highly credentialed cognitive psychologists, economists and ethnographers from top universities around the world”.[...]

December 7th, 2009 - 8:21 pm § in Search engines

10 papers on personalization (PSearch)

Google announced this week that they would start personalising search results, even for users that are not signed into a Google service at the time. It has caused a consistent flow of posts from the blogosphere and quite a lot of comments as well which show that there is a gap in knowledge at some [[...]

November 16th, 2009 - 4:35 pm § in Search engines

Serendipity on the Web

I’ve been catching up on all my reading these last couple of weeks and I particularly liked “From X-Rays to Silly Putty via Uranus: Serendipity and its Role in Web Search”. It’s by Paul André from Southampton University together with Jaime Teevan and Susan Dumais from Micros[...]

October 6th, 2009 - 3:18 pm § in Search engines

Can gibberish rank? Why Certainly.

We could argue until the cows came home as which 2 main elements of SEO were the core components. I’ll cut to the chase and ask you to consider content and links alone this time round. They are (arguably) the most important two variables present in the SEO diagram at this time. It makes sense [...]

July 3rd, 2009 - 5:02 pm § in Search engines

Search User Interfaces

Just a heads-up in case you missed my tweet: Marti Hearst (Berkeley professor and hands down brilliant in search research) has made her new book “Search User Interfaces” freely available to everyone. You can buy the book if you fancy having a dead-tree copy or you can read the online one[...]

June 16th, 2009 - 6:15 pm § in Search engines

Bing!? Yup Yup.

I’ve read some of the reviews on Bing and the comparisons to the other engines too. It seems that Bing is actually being well recieved by the general public and the SEO people as well. I like Bing, I like Google as well, and I like Yahoo! too but all for different reasons. My reasons [...][...]

June 9th, 2009 - 12:19 am § in Search engines

Bing in less than 5mins

I don’t usually blog about things unless I feel I really have something to add to the current discussion and in the case of Bing I don’t think I do. I haven’t had much time to play with Bing and evaluate it as it deserves to be, so the following is a short list of [...][...]

June 5th, 2009 - 4:37 pm § in Search engines

Inbenta announces New “Semantic Site Search” engine

Just a heads-up: “Inbenta announces the launch of “Semantic Site Search”, a new service (SaaS-based) that provides search to any website within the cloud computing. After four years of development (project codename: voldemort), this search service includes Semantic Search capabilit[...]

May 1st, 2009 - 4:47 pm § in Search engines

Wolfram Screenshots (RWW)

ReadWriteWeb have posted screenshots of Wolfram Alpha in action. Do go and have a look, it’s great that you guys are all going to get to try it out soon as well. As you will see, it is not at all like Google, and I think that the happiest people in the world will be [...][...]

April 30th, 2009 - 6:20 pm § in Information/text analysis, Search engines

Semantic similarity revisited

I’m a big word fan, a pattern spotter, and an enthusiast of this paper: “Measuring Semantic Similarity between Words Using Web Search Engines” by Bollegala, Matsuo, Ishizuka (Univeristy Tokyo & AIST). It’s a way to meaure how closely relate words are using web search engi[...]





© 2009-2013 Science for SEO All Rights Reserved -- Copyright notice by Blog Copyright

SEO Powered by Platinum SEO from Techblissonline

Twitter links powered by Tweet This v1.8.1, a WordPress plugin for Twitter.